Each wine cost roughly $20 and each of these wines were considered to be good ambassadors of their "provenance."

Given that this was Manhattan, the Napa Valley choice was the most critical. I knew that my Indian friends who would be tasting these wines, drink a lot of Napa Cabernet. I couldn't just introduce them to another one. There had to be something special about it.

My choice - the Charles Krug Cabernet Sauvignon 2005 from the Yountville winery in Napa Valley. Known as Napa's first winery, this is the original Mondavi winery owned and managed by the Peter Mondavi family. This is the very same winery that Robert Mondavi left in 1966 when he fought with his father. Needless to say, it didn't disappoint. Tasting blind, everyone immediately identified this as a young Cabernet Sauvignon from Napa. The group was pleasantly surprised to learn that Charles Krug Winery is arguably as important as Robert Mondavi in the history of wine making in America.

The next wine chosen was a Château Greysac 2003 from the Medoc in Bordeaux. Bottled in the Château itself, this Cru Bourgeois Superieur, I was told, was made in the classic Bordeaux style. I thought it would be perfect for my needs. But here, there was a problem. When decanting the wine an hour before the guests were to arrive, I noticed signs of seepage. The cork was obviously faulty and wine had seeped all the way up the cork. A quick sniff and I could tell that oxidation had occurred. Nevertheless, I chose to include it in the tasting. Most of the group found the nose unusual but were quite happy with the taste. The wine had retained some of the velvet, balance and smoothness that one finds in a Bordeaux wine.

When shopping for the wines, I was pleasantly surprised to discover a Nipozzano Riserva Chianti Rufina 2005 from the Frescobaldi family. Knowing that this wine is available in many hotel restaurants in India, it was an obvious choice to include from Italy. And the wine did not disappoint. With the 2004 ranked 91 points by Wine Spectator, this wine certainly had strong pedigree and it showed. With complex fragrance, dark fruit, spiciness, hints of coffee and a good finish, it was my favorite. Most others at the tasting liked it too.

The fourth wine was an Ondarre Reserva Rioja 2002 from Spain. The tempranillo grape which constituted 75% of the wine was new to most of the guests and they had mixed feelings about it. They liked the strong attack and found it to be full bodied with good oak. But somehow it was overshadowed by the Charles Krug Cabernet.

The final wine was a Punto Final Malbec 2007. The youngest wine of all. Here was another wine with good pedigree. Both the 2006 and the 2004 were rated 90 plus by Wine Enthusiast. During the tasting itself, this wine did very well. There were lots of oos and ahs about it as the group tasted it blind. This was largely because of its rich bouquet and velvety texture. However, strangely enough, this was the only bottle with wine left in it at the end of the evening.

Wine tastings are both easy and fun to organize and to attend. Everything from choosing the wines, to thinking carefully about how much your guests know about wine, to the introductory speech and the order of the wine, counts. There's no science to this but one thing is for certain, the more tastings you organize, the more you will be able to share the joys of wine drinking with friends and other enthusiasts.

On a side note, as the guests were still learning about wine, a simple tasting sheet was included for each person. The tasting sheet gave guests the criteria with which to describe the wine through a series of questions, which made the tasting easier for them.